| 论保证期间 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：高晓莹，杨明刚.论保证期间[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2011,(2):130-135 |
| 摘要点击次数: 936 |
| 全文下载次数: 106 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:我国司法解释及实践中，将保证期间确定为除斥期间，在学说上存在较大争议，法律适用上也出现了逻辑矛盾、价值判断混乱等诸多问题。而将保证期间定性为诉讼时效，则既有理论支撑，更能实现债权人、债务人和保证人之间的利益平衡，因此应根据诉讼时效的相关规则对保证期间制度进行重构。 |
| 中文关键词:保证期间 除斥期间 诉讼时效 |
| |
| On Guarantee Period |
|
|
| Abstract:There is biggish controversy in which the nature of guarantee period is determined as scheduled period during judicial interpretation and practice. There are also logic contradiction and value judgment confusions in legal application of it. Provided that the nature of guarantee period is determined as the prescriptive period, which has theoretical support and shall realize the interest balance among creditors, debtors and guarantors. Therefore, guarantee period shall be reconstructed according to the relevant rules on the prescriptive period. |
| keywords:guarantee period scheduled period the prescriptive period |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
