| 《唐书辑校》指瑕 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：孙思旺.《唐书辑校》指瑕[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2012,(5):25-31 |
| 摘要点击次数: 1341 |
| 全文下载次数: 96 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:《太平御览》引唐史甚夥，其文与刘书今本颇有同异，吴玉贵教授录之一编，逐条校证，有功于学术匪浅。然制巨卷繁，不能稍无疏漏。汉崔骃《章帝谥议》称引《尧典》，名以《唐书》，盖取经今文五家之教。吴氏不察，目以为李唐之史，遂误收崔《议》为今本阙载之文。其论《御览》、《旧书》之厏厊，尽归诸咸平三年有宋校史。殊不知当日君臣秕糠《旧书》，虽有官校之命，曾未令胄监刊板。且校史修史毕竟不同，删削之说，恐以非罪加诸昔贤。至若论“光福里第起兄弟同居”、“白衣宫锦袍”、“本某寺家人”、“一石止水”等处，亦各有舛误。 |
| 中文关键词:太平御览 尧典 咸平校史 某寺家人 止水 |
| |
| On the Flaws in the Collection and Collation of Tangshu |
|
|
| Abstract:There are a lot of quotations from Book of Tang in Taiping Imperial Encyclopedia, but many of which are not identical to their counterparts in Old Book of Tang. Professor Wu Yu-gui examined and corrected all of those item by item, compiling a great valuable book named Tangshujijiao. Perhaps because of confronting a vast literature, Professor Wu drew a few wrong conclusions. Cui Yin, a notable scholar in Han Dynasty, called The Canon of Yao “TangShu” in his Deliberation on the Posthumous Name of Emperor Zhangdi. However, Wu accepted it as the official dynastic history of the Tang period which was also known as Tangshu in ancient Chinese documents. As to the discrepancy between the quotations in Taiping Imperial Encyclopedia and the originals in Old Book of Tang, Wu attributed it to the formal collation organized by the Government in Song Dynasty. In fact, the Song scholars did not think much of Old Book of Tang. As a result, the so-called collated edition in the 3rd year of Reign Title of Xianping was not engraved for printing. |
| keywords:Taiping Imperial Encyclopedia The Canon of Yao the formal collation servant owned by monastery still water |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
次