| 张家山汉简《奏谳书》与岳麓书院秦简《为狱等状四种》的初步比较 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：［德］ 劳武利著，李婧嵘译.张家山汉简《奏谳书》与岳麓书院秦简《为狱等状四种》的初步比较[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2013,(3):5-9 |
| 摘要点击次数: 1234 |
| 全文下载次数: 140 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:经过岳麓秦简《为狱等状四种》与张家山汉简《奏谳书》的比较,发现《奏谳书》与《状四种》这两个案例集有很多相同的法律术语，而且刑罚等级及据此确定的加刑、减刑原则及诉讼程序基本一致。《奏谳书》中的三类案例也见于岳麓秦简《状四种》中：“疑罪”类；“乞鞫”类以及“上得微难狱者”类。可以说，虽然经过了朝代更迭，由秦朝所建立的司法机构大体上被汉朝予以采纳，在根本上没有大的改变。 |
| 中文关键词:岳麓秦简 《为狱等状四种》 法律术语 诉讼程序 案例分类 |
| |
| The First Result of Comparison between the Paleographic Case Collections “Zouyanshu” from Zhangjiashan and “Wei yu deng zhuang si zhong” from the Yuelu Academy |
|
|
| Abstract:A comparison of the newly acquired bamboo manuscripts of the case collection “Wei yu deng zhuang si zhong” from pre imperial Qin with the “Zouyanshu” from the beginning of the Han dynasty shows a considerable degree of correspondence in legal terminology, the hierarchy of punishments, the principles for determining punishment and the different stages of criminal procedure. Some similarities and differences between the two case collections will be illustrated by each an example of the three common categories of criminal cases (“doubt about the punishment”, “petition for a retrial”, “recommendations of competent investigators for a promotion”). The legal institutions established by the Qin were to a great extent adopted and not substantially altered after the change of dynasty. |
| keywords:Yuelu Academy Collection of Qin slips “Wei yu deng zhuang si zhong” legal terminology stages of criminal procedure classification of criminal cases |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
次