| 传统之源——兼谈“六经”的价值 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：姜广辉,吴国龙.传统之源——兼谈“六经”的价值[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2013,(4):5-12 |
| 摘要点击次数: 1160 |
| 全文下载次数: 96 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:“六经”是中国文化传统的最早源头，也是华夏民族核心价值的集中体现。虽然历史上也曾有外来文化汇入中国文化的情况，但这个最初之“源”对中国文化的发展一直起着主导性的作用。本文之所以采用“传统之源”的题目，意在澄清中国文化之“源”乃是“六经”，诸子百家只是其“流”。我们可以将中国哲学史划分为这样两个阶段：“先秦的元典时代”和“汉以后的经学时代”。这个“元典”既包括“六经”的“元典”，也包括继起的诸子学“元典”。而“六经”又是诸子学之“源”。胡适等人所谓“截断众流”的中国哲学史写作方法是不可取的。 |
| 中文关键词:中国文化 传统之源 六经 价值观 |
| |
| The Furthest Source of Chinese Culture——On the Value of Six Classics of Confucians |
|
|
| Abstract:The “six classics of Confucians” is the furthest source of Chinese culture, which also represents the core values of the Chinese nation. Although there were intermingles with the foreign cultures in history, the primary “source” kept its leading role for the development of Chinese culture. In this paper the title “source of the tradition” is adopted to prove that the “source” of Chinese culture is the “six classics of Confucians”, other schools of the contemporary scholars were merely branches of the culture. We can divide the history of Chinese philosophy into two periods: “pre-Qin dynasty supreme classics age” and “post-Han dynasty Confucians classics age”. “Supreme classics” here includes both “six classics of Confucians” and “classics” of other contemporary scholars; meanwhile, “six classics of Confucians” was the “source” of all other scholars. The so called “discarding all pre-Taoist and Confucians classics” theory for writing the history of Chinese philosophy from scholars like Hu Shi is not recommendable. |
| keywords:Chinese culture source of the tradition six classics of Confucians values |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
