| 《侵权责任法》36条适用中表达自由的保护 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：蔡唱，张艳楠.《侵权责任法》36条适用中表达自由的保护[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2015,(5):144-149 |
| 摘要点击次数: 912 |
| 全文下载次数: 52 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:《侵权责任法》第36条适用中会产生对表达自由侵害问题。当前网络侵权规则适用困境表现在具体案件中表达自由无确定保障和自由的行使无替代途径。形成原因包括宪法性权利和自由的侵害无有效的救济途径、36条规则设计忽视了表达自由的保护和法条实施效果容易造成对表达自由的侵害。走出困境的路径有五个方面。包括着力构建司法解释统一条件下的二元模式、在法律解释中体现对表达自由保护的三原则、注重特殊主体利益保护和区分不同场合保护表达自由等。问题的根本解决还要从宏观入手，理顺宪法性权利和自由与民法上权利的关系，加强行业自律以保护表达自由。 |
| 中文关键词:侵权责任法36条的适用 表达自由 保护 |
| |
| The Protection of Freedom of Expression in The Enforcement of Article 36 of Torts |
|
|
| Abstract:The most special and important conflict of rights in the enforcement of article 36 of tort law of the People’s Republic of China is the conflict of freedom of expression and the right of personality. This is a conflict between basic freedom in Constitutional Law and private rights.Rules applied to the common media are not suitable to handle this conflict for differences of internet media. The protection of freedom of expression by Article 36 is recessive,it has no means of relief at the same time. When resolving conflicts, it is important to know that the fast diffusion contributes to both the spread of damage and the elimination of damage.Reasons can be found from institutional angle and duty angle which formed conflicts. It is an important method to balance the interests ( freedom) of civil subjects. Freedom of expression and the right of personality should to be equally protected. When interpreting and implementing the rule, it has to accord with principle of freedom of expression restriction. We can resolve this conflict in macroscopic view and microcosmic view. Ethics method and law method are necessary to handle this problem, self-regulation could also play an important role. |
| keywords:Enforcement of Article 36 of Torts Freedom of Expression Protection |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
位访问者,今日访问
