| 历史不能臆说——也谈周氏兄弟的“失和”原因 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：宋剑华，买琳芳.历史不能臆说——也谈周氏兄弟的“失和”原因[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2016,(6):96-101 |
| 摘要点击次数: 713 |
| 全文下载次数: 18 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:鲁迅与周作人两人之间的兄弟“失和”，是学界一直都在探讨的一宗公案。许多研究者出于维护鲁迅崇高的社会声誉，完全按照许广平或周海婴的一面之词，把责任全都推给了周作人和羽太信子，进而彻底遮蔽了该事件发生的历史真相。在查阅历史资料的过程中我们发现，学界目前所持有的见解或观点，几乎都属于主观臆说，根本就站不住脚。从《鲁迅日记》和《周作人日记》比照来看，这桩遭到兄弟二人误解的家庭矛盾，其实与鲁迅和周作人的思想人格，都没有太大的关联性或因果关系。因此走出“偷窥”隐私的学界偏见，回归学术研究的正常轨道，用历史事实说话而不是去捕风捉影，才是鲁迅研究的正确选择。 |
| 中文关键词:鲁迅 周作人 兄弟“失和” 主观臆说 |
| |
| History Cannot be Assumed——a Discussion about Zhou Brothers' "Estranged" Causes |
|
|
| Abstract:The brothers' estrangement between Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren in academic circles has been a koan. Many researchers in order to maintain high social prestige of Lu Xun, they were all on the side of Zhou Haiying and Xu Guangping, and put all the responsibility onto Zhou Zuoren and Yutaixinzi, as a result, it completely obscured the historical truth of the events. Now in the process of historical data, we found that scholars currently held views or opinions that almost all of them were subjective assumptions, they were simply untenable. From “Lu Xun's Diary” and “Zhou Zuoren Diary”, it turned out that the two brothers had got misunderstanding. In fact, by Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren's personality, they were not associated with each other very much. So out of the “voyeuristic” privacy academic bias, it is advisable that we return to the normal track of academic research, respect the historical facts rather than hearsay evidence. It is the right choice for the study of Lu Xun. |
| keywords:Lu Xun Zhou Zuoren Brothers' estranged Subjective assumption |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
|
|
|
位访问者,今日访问