“克己复礼为仁”思想研究:概念、关系及路径选择
    点此下载全文
引用本文:郭园兰.“克己复礼为仁”思想研究:概念、关系及路径选择[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2017,(4):39-44
摘要点击次数: 711
全文下载次数: 0
作者单位
郭园兰 (湖南大学 岳麓书院湖南 长沙 410082) 
中文摘要:“克己复礼为仁”内含儒家思想系统的基本范畴,是掌握孔子思想的关键。后世尤其是现当代对这一思想的研究从未停止,且争论不断。“克己”涵盖修身、“约己”等含义,“礼”可诠释为周礼、节文乃至人性修养,“仁”可诠释为人际关系乃至内在德性、实践理性。“礼”“仁”之间至少有仁先礼后、礼先仁后、仁礼统一、仁礼分疏等不同关系。“克己复礼为仁”研究属政治学、社会学抑或伦理学,争议明显,历史学家与哲学家也存在治学方法旨趣上的差异,作为内证文本的《论语》《左传》也有优劣之别。未来研究中,我们应从诠释个案出发,立足多维视域,予以综合考察。
中文关键词:“克己复礼为仁”  概念  关系  研究路径
 
Research of Confucian Ideology Mastering Oneself(Ke-ji)and Returning to Propriety(Fu-li) Is Perfect Virtue(Ren): Concepts,Relations and Approaches
Abstract:Mastering Oneself(Ke-ji)and Returning to Propriety(Fu-li) as Perfect Virtue(Ren) contains basic categories of Confucian ideological system and it is the key to master ideas of Confucius.Modern and contemporary off-springs have never stopped researching this system but are always in dispute.Ke-ji means cultivating and mastering oneself.Li could mean either proprieties in the Zhou Dynasty,or general rituals and norms in social context.Ren means morality and rational thinking in human relations.Ren can come either after or before Li;they can either integrate with each other or depart from each other.It is quite disputable about whether this is research of politics,sociology or ethnics.Even historians and philosophers diverge in their research methodology.As texts for research,the Analects of Confucius and Zuo Zhuan also vary in quality.In future,integrated research from various perspectives with case study should be emphasized.
keywords:Mastering Oneself(Ke-ji)and Returning to Propriety(Fu-li) as Perfect Virtue(Ren)  concept  relation  approachs
查看全文   查看/发表评论   下载pdf阅读器