| 船山于朱子、阳明“知行之辩”互斥模式之解构 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：朱汉民,杨 超.船山于朱子、阳明“知行之辩”互斥模式之解构[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2018,(6):12-19 |
| 摘要点击次数: 900 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:在价值层面，朱子、阳明都企图达到知行统一之目标。在学理的架构上，朱子、阳明因时立言，其“知行”在先后上，呈互斥模式：朱子主张知先行后，偏重于求知；阳明企图扭转此局面，而倡“知行同时发动”之说，更强调“行”。船山也有知行统一之宏愿，在同情了解之后，指出朱子、阳明二人均重知而轻行，随后赋予知行之“先后”以“缓急”的内蕴。在理论架构上，船山主张“知缓行急”，将行作为知的目的与归宿，无分先后，解构了朱王二人的知行观，化解了其互斥模式，力争使得知行统一在学理上成为可能，亦试图求得圣人原意，使得己说不止于因时立言，而赋予其“千万年语”之意涵。 |
| 中文关键词:王夫之 朱熹 王阳明 知行观 解构 |
| |
| Corrections of the Mutual Exclusion Mode of “Zhixing”, Zhu Zi and Yang Ming |
|
|
| Abstract:Zhu Zi and Yang Ming all attempt to achieve the goal of realizing the unity of knowledge and practice. However, on the structure of the academic structure, Zhu Zi and Yang Ming made a statement on the basis of the fact that their "cicadas" were in a mutually exclusive mode in succession. Zhu Zi advocated that he should focus on knowledge first and then on knowledge. Yang Ming attempted to reverse this situation, but he advocated "the knowledge bank simultaneously launched", more emphasis is on "line". Mountain also has the ambition of unification, out of a sympathetic understanding he, points out that the neo-confucianist, Yang Ming both as prophets, give behavior "successively" intrinsic "priorities", they advocated "go slow" on the theoretical framework, the row as the purpose and end-result, no points successively, justification shu-oh of two people knowledge view, resolving the mutex mode, striving to make the unification of becoming possible in theory, also trying to get saint meaning, makes has said more than for speaking, and giving its implications of the "thousand Wan Nianyu". |
| keywords:Wang fuzhi Zhu xi Wang yangming concept of knowledge justification |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
|
|
|
位访问者,今日访问