| “动物与人”：叙事伦理、悖反性与双重困境指向——论“抉择之痛”作为功能指涉的效力边际 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：陈 佳 冀.“动物与人”：叙事伦理、悖反性与双重困境指向——论“抉择之痛”作为功能指涉的效力边际[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2019,(5):87-94 |
| 摘要点击次数: 861 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:对初始情境中受难者“陷困”功能的探讨，是“动物叙事”叙事语法研究中不容忽视的一环，其中贯穿了一个最为基础的叙事功能指向——“抉择之痛”。强调“动物与人”两类受难者角色在身体、心理抑或情感维度陷入某种矛盾与纠结的状态，并且彼此间时常呈现出一定的矛盾悖反性。这一角色身份由动物形象与人类形象分别或共同承担，均指向一种叙事伦理层面的现代境遇的表达。在题材范畴方面，这一功能指涉涵盖了家养类与野生类“动物叙事”各自的叙事范畴。其效力边际已不仅仅局限在单纯生态视域与人性指涉的层面，而是凸显现代语境下人类所面临的共通性的伦理困境：一种挥之不去的矛盾、困惑与不安的情感和心境的写照。 |
| 中文关键词:动物叙事 “抉择之痛” 叙事伦理 困境指向 |
| |
| "Animal and Human": Narrative Ethics, Rebellion and Double Dilemma Point——On the Marginal Effect of "the Pain of Choice" as Functional Reference |
|
|
| Abstract:The discussion about “trapped” function of the victims in the initial situation is a part of being invisible, which runs through the most basic narrative function pointing to "the pain of choice". It emphasizes that the two types of victims of "animal and human" fall into a state of contradiction and entanglement in the physical, psychological or emotional dimensions, and often show certain contradiction. This role is assumed separately or jointly by animal images and human images, both of which point to the expression of modern circumstances at the level of narrative ethics. In terms of subject area, this function refers to the narrative category that covers the domestic and wild "animal narrative".Its marginal effectiveness has not only been limited to the purely ecological domain and the aspects of human nature, but also highlighted the common ethical dilemma faced by humans in the modern context: A kind of lingering emotions and moods portrayal of the ambivalence, confusion and uneasiness. |
| keywords:animal narrative "the pain of choice " narrative ethics dilemma point |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
