| 荀子非子思孟轲案再鞫 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：廖 名 春1，2.荀子非子思孟轲案再鞫[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2022,(2):15-19 |
| 摘要点击次数: 264 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:由《荀子》书“案（安、按）”的虚词用法看，《非十二子》篇论子思、孟轲一段为先秦文法无疑，属于荀子特有的语言风格；从《荀子·非十二子》篇与《韩诗外传》相应段落文义内容的比较来看，《荀子·非十二子》篇是原创，而《韩诗外传》则是杂凑抄录。将《荀子·非十二子》篇对子思、孟轲的批评说成是荀子后学所为，否定其为荀子之作，经不起先秦秦汉文献的检验，只能说是无稽之谈。 |
| 中文关键词:荀子 非十二子 韩诗外传 案 |
| |
| A Re-examination of Xunzi's Criticisms of Zi Si and Meng Ke |
|
|
| Abstract:From the usage of the function word “案” in Xunzi, which is also written as “安” or “按”, the discussion on Zi Si and Meng Ke in the Chapter of Critical Reviews on Twelve Scholars（《荀子·非十二子》） is undoubtedly in line with the grammar of the Pre-Qin Dynasty, and it belongs to the unique language style of Xunzi. From the comparison of the content of the corresponding paragraphs between the Chapter of Critical Reviews on Twelve Scholars and Han Shi Wai Zhuan（《韩诗外传》）, it can be seen that the Chapter of Critical Reviews on Twelve Scholars is original, while Han Shi Wai Zhuan is made up of piecemeal texts. The view that the criticism of Zi Si and Meng Ke in Xunzi are the work of descendants of Xun Zi school and denies Xunzi's work as nonsense, which can not stand the test of the documents of the pre-Qin, Qin and Han Dynasties. |
| keywords:Xunzi the Chapter of Critical Reviews on Twelve Scholars Han Shi Wai Zhuan an(案) |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
