| 批朱与述王：季本解经的两重进路及其思想意义——以《大学私存》为例 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：肖永明 ， 李 江.批朱与述王：季本解经的两重进路及其思想意义——以《大学私存》为例[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2023,(1):20-26 |
| 摘要点击次数: 268 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:明代中后期，王学内部讲学之风盛行，但阳明后学季本却不喜讲学，以重读书、擅解经著称，呈现出异于王门诸子的特质。其所著《大学私存》，既对朱子“格物”“新民”等思想展开批判，又借由对《大学》的新诠，为阳明的“格物”解确立经典依据，透显出从“批朱”与“述王”两重进路解经的鲜明特色。此对王学而言具有重要的思想意义：一方面，继承阳明展开对朱子的批判，通过辨朱学之“非”明王学之“是”，在讲学之外拓展了宣扬王学的形式，推动了阳明学的发展；另一方面，绾合经学文本与义理而为一,弥合阳明“以心解经”之不足，纠正了过分依赖讲学、轻视经典所导致的空疏之弊。 |
| 中文关键词:季本 批朱 述王 《大学私存》 阳明学 |
| |
| Criticisms of Zhu and Exposition of Wang: the Dual Aspects and the Meaning of Ji Ben’s Classics Annotation——Taking Ji Ben’s Notes of the Great Learning as an Example |
|
|
| Abstract:The Lecture prevailed among Yangming studies group during the middle and late Ming Dynasty.But Ji Ben, one of the Yangming’s followers, was even less enthusiastic about the Lecture. He was well-known for his love of reading and concentrating on classic annotation . His work, Notes of the Great Learning, mainly has two characteristics:criticisms of Zhu and exposition of Wang.He criticized Zhu Xi’s explanation for “Gewu” and “Xinmin”. Meanwhile,he creatively explained the Great Learning in order to establish a tight relationship between Confucian classics and Yangming’s interpretation of “Gewu”.His classics annotation is significant for Yangming studies. On the one hand,criticism of Zhu was helpful to spread Yangming studies . On the other hand, exposition of Wang can reduce the problems that arose from Yangming’s special classical interpretation method and redress the drawbacks caused by depending on Lecture and neglecting Confucian classic. |
| keywords:Ji Ben criticisms of Zhu exposition of Wang Notes of the Great Learning Yangming studies |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
位访问者,今日访问
