人工智能生成发明专利保护制度研究
    点此下载全文
引用本文:冯晓青,郝明英.人工智能生成发明专利保护制度研究[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2023,(2):143-152
摘要点击次数: 175
全文下载次数: 0
作者单位
冯晓青,郝明英 (中国政法大学 民商经济法学院北京 100088) 
中文摘要:随着人工智能技术不断发展,人工智能作为“创新主体”生成发明对现行专利制度提出了巨大挑战,如人工智能生成发明是否属于可专利主题、发明人主体资格与人工智能生成发明权利归属如何确定、人工智能生成发明专利权保护对公共利益是否可能产生损害等。在客体制度中,人工智能生成发明属于可专利主题,能够满足新颖性、创造性、实用性要求,其中在创造性判断中有必要根据人工智能特点适当调整“本领域普通技术人员”的判断标准。在主体制度中,发明人需为“自然人”,在激励理论下探讨人工智能生成发明的权利归属,需要综合衡量各主体的作用、贡献度以及激励程度来进行确认。在限制制度中,有必要考虑人工智能生成发明专利权保护期的设定、充分公开义务的加强以及防止权利滥用措施。
中文关键词:人工智能  发明专利  可专利性  权利归属  算法  公共领域
 
Research on the Patent Protection System for Inventions Generated by AI
Abstract:Artificial intelligence(AI)-generated inventions pose great challenges to the patent legal system, such as whether AI-generated inventions belong to the patentable subject, how to determine the inventorship and ownership of the right of AI-generated inventions, and whether the damage to the public interest may be caused by the patent protection of AI-generated inventions. In the patent object system, the invention generated by AI is the patentable subject, which can meet the requirements of novelty, creativity and practicability. In the judgment of creativity, it is necessary to adjust the standard of “ordinary technician in this field” appropriately according to the characteristics of AI. In the patent subject system, the inventor should be “human beings”. Under the incentive theory, the attribution of rights genenated by Al inventions requires a comprehensive assessment of the role and contribution of each subject and the degrere of incentive required. In the patent restriction system, it is necessary to consider the setting of patent right protection period, the strengthening of full disclosure obligation and the measures to prevent the abuse of rights.
keywords:artificial intelligence  invention patent  patentability  attribution of rights  algorithm  public domain
查看全文   查看/发表评论   下载pdf阅读器