| 民行交叉争议的困境化解及路径选择 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：胡 煜.民行交叉争议的困境化解及路径选择[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2023,(4):146-153 |
| 摘要点击次数: 212 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:为应对司法实践中民事与行政交叉争议的难题，避免裁判冲突、提高诉讼效率，立法确立了有限范围的一并审理程序。但一并审理程序忽略了问题背后更深层次的基础理论，导致该程序的启动与基本诉讼原理相矛盾、有限的适用范围与无限的界定标准相矛盾、过分追求个案正义与法的安定性相矛盾。以行政机关规制意图为核心视角重新审视民行交叉争议，以行政行为跨程序性效力解决这一难题更为科学与规范。宜在诉讼程序分离原则、法的安定性优先原则、正确识别交叉争议原则下，按照行政机关规制意图的作用方式和影响范围划分不同的交叉争议类型并拟定相应的解决路径。 |
| 中文关键词:民行交叉争议 行政行为效力 规制意图 解决机制 |
| |
| The Dilemma Resolution and Path Choice of the Cross Dispute between Civil and Administration |
|
|
| Abstract:In order to cope with the intersecting problems of civil and administrative affairs in judicial practice, the legislation has formally established a limited range of collective trial procedures, aimed at avoiding conflicts in judgments and improving the efficiency of litigation. However, ignoring the deeper basic theories attached to the superficial problems led to the initiation of the procedure contradicting the basic litigation principles, the limited scope of application contradicting the infinite defining standards, and the excessive pursuit of individual justice contradicting the stability of the law. It is more scientific and standardized to re-examine the cross-controversy of civil and administrative affairs with the regulatory intention of the administrative agency as the core perspective and to address this issue with cross procedural effectiveness of administrative acts. Under the principle of separation of litigation procedures, the principle of priority of law stability, and the principle of correct identification of cross disputes, it’s appropriate to divide different types of cross disputes according to the mode of action and the scope of influence of the administrative agency’s regulatory intentions and draw up corresponding resolution paths. |
| keywords:civil and administrative cross dispute effectiveness of administrative acts regulatory intention resolution mechanism |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
