| 普通话儿童空宾结构与动词短语省略感知研究 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：陈秋霞1，陈晓湘1，周秋燕1，梅云皓1，卫晓旭2.普通话儿童空宾结构与动词短语省略感知研究[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2023,(6):91-99 |
| 摘要点击次数: 69 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:通过实验探讨普通话儿童感知空宾结构与动词短语省略结构的归属问题，本研究主要从三个方面进行考察：主动句与被动句的对比，并列句与嫁接小句的对比，状语恢复中的平行情景与不平行情景的对比。结果表明：受试儿童能够区分形式相似的空宾结构和动词短语结构。一是对于动词短语省略，如果先行句是被动结构，那么句子不合语法；而对于空宾结构，即使先行句是被动结构，句子也合语法。二是动词短语省略只能用于并列句，不能出现在嫁接小句中；而空宾结构在这两种句式中都可以。三是在状语恢复方面，儿童能够区分动词短语省略和空宾结构，在对动词短语省略解释时，必须进行状语恢复。 |
| 中文关键词:普通话儿童 空宾结构 动词短语省略 |
| |
| Perception of Mandarin Null Object Construction and Verb Phrase Ellipsis in Children Speaking Mandarin |
|
|
| Abstract:Based on the experiment, this paper explores whether null object construction (NOC) in Mandarin Chinese is a kind of verb phrase ellipsis (VPE) from the perspective of child speech perception. Three kinds of contrasts between the two elliptical constructions are investigated: the active versus passive sentence, the coordinate versus subordinate sentence, as well as the parallel versus nonparallel scenarios in terms of adverbial recovery. The results indicate that children can correctly distinguish VPE from NOC.Specifically.(1) Children know that VPE in passive VP antecedent contexts is grammatically degraded, but NOC is not. They can reject the nonparallel VPE sentences most of the time.(2) Children know that VPE can not occur in the subordinate clauses, but NOC can. (3) Children know the differences between VPE and NOC in terms of adverbial recovery, and they understand that the adverbial recovery is obligatory in the interpretation of VPE. |
| keywords:Mandarin children null object construction verb phrase ellipsis |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
位访问者,今日访问
