反讽与自由——施莱格尔反讽与克尔凯郭尔反讽关系研究

张照生1; 2

反讽与自由——施莱格尔反讽与克尔凯郭尔反讽关系研究

引用本文：张照生1，2.反讽与自由——施莱格尔反讽与克尔凯郭尔反讽关系研究[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2024,(3):97-102

摘要点击次数: 72

全文下载次数: 0

作者	单位
张照生1，2	（1.湖南师范大学文学院，湖南长沙 410081；2.湖南理工学院中国语言文学学院，湖南岳阳 414006）

中文摘要:克尔凯郭尔对施莱格尔反讽的批判呈现出他们反讽在服务对象、否决程度与主观性方面的相异。但他们反讽均是苏格拉底反讽的现代发展，是作为一种普遍原则的反讽，致力于反叛理性主义的禁锢与意识自由。他们还要诗人凭借反讽凌越形式、素材、写作惯性乃至创作本身，实现创制自由并导引读者解放自我。二人反讽启迪着众多现代西方作家与哲学家采取反传统写作与断片化叙事，质询与反思着自然坚实的传统和日益内化的理性主义。

中文关键词:施莱格尔克尔凯郭尔反讽自由

Irony and Freedom— A Study on the Relationship between Schlegel’s Irony and Kierkegaard’s Irony

Abstract:Kierkegaard’s criticisms of Schlegel’s irony reveal that their irony is different concering the object of service, the degree of veto and subjectivity. Their irony is the modern development of Socratic irony， irony serves as a universal principle， committed to rebel the imprisonment of rationalism and freedom of consciousness. They also require poets to use irony to transcend forms，materials，writing inertia and even creation itself to achieve creative freedom and guide readers to liberate themselves. Their irony has inspired many modern western writers and philosophers to adopt anti-traditional writing and fragmented narration，questioning and reflecting on the natural solid tradition and increasingly internalized rationalism.

keywords:Schlegel Kierkegaard irony freedom

查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器