| 古代赋论的诗学本位 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：易闻晓.古代赋论的诗学本位[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2024,(4):83-91 |
| 摘要点击次数: 60 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:赋以铺陈，是乃赋体创制的本质要义。宋玉承接屈辞以定赋体，开启汉赋叙物一途，不关《诗》学之旨。但以班固“赋者古诗之流”为代表的汉代赋论本于《诗》学经义，强将楚辞纳入《诗》学流变体系，形成以《诗》论赋的既定传统而影响久远；六朝赋论仍之，强调比兴讽喻；而唐以降赋话援取诗法之例，讲求律赋作法，反映六朝骈赋以至唐代律赋的“诗化”演变与铺陈丧失。凡此表现为古代赋论的诗学本位，在最为基本的观念上有悖赋体创制的本质特点。 |
| 中文关键词:赋学 赋论 诗经 诗学 古诗之流 |
| |
| The Poetic Basis of Ancient Criticisms of Fu |
|
|
| Abstract:Fu is characterized with elaboration which is the essence of the creation of Fu . Inheriting Chu Ci by Qu Yuan, Song Yu established the style of Fu and initiated the way of object-description in Han Fu which was unrelated with Shi Jing studies. However, represented by Ban Gu’s view that “Fu is the descendant of ancient poetry”, the Fu criticisms in the Han Dynasty was fundamentally based on the exegetical meanings of Shi Jing which enforced Chu Ci being taken in the evolutionary of Shi Jing studies and formed the far-reaching tradition of critiquing Fu by the standard of Shi Jing. The Fu criticism in the Six Dynasties continued to that trend but emphasized metaphor and allegory. Since the Tang Dynasty, the discussion on Fu took examples by poetry techniques and highlighted the techniques of regulated Fu which reflected the “poetization” evolution from parallel Fu in the Six Dynasties to the regulated Fu in the Tang Dynasty as well as the loss of elaboration. All the above representing Shi Jing studies was fundamental to the ancient Fu criticism which essentially contradicted the elemental characteristics of the creation of the style of Fu. |
| keywords:Fu studies Fu criticisms Shi Jing study of Shi Jing descendants of Shi Jing |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
位访问者,今日访问
