超越反思的与前反思的:对康德自我意识理论的第三种解释
    点此下载全文
引用本文:余天放.超越反思的与前反思的:对康德自我意识理论的第三种解释[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2025,(5):112-119
摘要点击次数: 93
全文下载次数: 48
作者单位
余天放 (上海师范大学 哲学系 上海 200234) 
中文摘要:基于亨利希的批判性讨论,康德的自我意识理论中发展出反思的解读和前反思的解读两种方案。前者主张康德的自我意识源于意识转向自身这一行动,后者则强调统觉概念的非关系性、非认定性等特征。这两种解读同时又代表了针对康德自我意识理论的两类更加一般的解释路径,分别是知识论的解释和形而上学的解释。然而在这些解释之外还存在的一种理解是,康德的自我既非一种先于一切意识或者思维的形而上学预设,也非一个可以被反思或者概念化的知识对象,而是由那些具有统一关系的表象中所显现出来的一个逻辑主体,用于解释经验知识的规范性来源。所以在康德看来,自我意识伴随于我们形成一个具有统一性的整体表象,但这并不意味着它是暗含的或者非关系性的,更不意味着它是对自身进行表象的结果。
中文关键词:康德  自我意识  迪特·亨利希  认知规范性
 
Beyond Reflective and Pre-reflective Interpretation: A Third Explanation towards Kant’s Theory of Self-Consciousness
Abstract:Based on Dieter Henrich’s critical discussion, two interpretive ways have emerged in Kant’s theory of self-consciousness: the reflective interpretation and the pre-reflective interpretation. The former holds that Kant’s self-consciousness stems from the act of consciousness turning towards itself, while the latter emphasizes the non-relational and non-identificational features of the concept of apperception. These two interpretations also represent two more general explanatory paths for Kant’s theory of self-consciousness, namely, the epistemological explanation and the metaphysical explanation. Beyond these explanations, however, there exists another understanding that Kant’s self is neither a metaphysical presupposition prior to all consciousness or thinking, nor a knowable object that can be reflected upon or conceptualized, but rather a logical subject that emerges from the unified relations of representations, it was used to explain the normative source of empirical knowledge. Therefore, in Kant’s view, self-consciousness accompanies our formation of a unified representation, but this does not mean that it is implicit or non-relational, nor does it mean that it is the result of representing oneself.
keywords:Kant  self-consciousness  Dieter Henrich  cognitive normativity
查看全文   查看/发表评论   下载pdf阅读器