| 人工智能法域外效力的立法基础与制度设计 |
 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：杜焕芳，柯晨亮.人工智能法域外效力的立法基础与制度设计[J].湖南大学学报社会科学版,2025,(5):120-130 |
| 摘要点击次数: 167 |
| 全文下载次数: 48 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:人工智能活动的跨国性决定了人工智能的治理应是全球性治理。由于当下人工智能国际法暂时以缺乏约束力的“软法”为主，以及因人工智能技术国际不平等造成部分国家国内立法空白，发展我国人工智能法的域外效力是实现人工智能国际治理的最适宜做法。国际法并未禁止国家发展其法律的域外效力，但域外效力的制度设计及其实现需满足“真正联系要求”。我国具备了实现人工智能法域外效力的国家能力与国家意愿，人工智能法域外效力的制度设计应采取人工智能监管法和人工智能民事责任法二分模式。前者设计适用属地管辖原则、效果管辖原则、保护性管辖原则三个层次的单边主义域外效力规则，而后者无需专门的域外效力规则，由法律适用选法规则调整即可。 |
| 中文关键词:人工智能法 域外效力 域外适用 人工智能治理 |
| |
| The Legislative Basis and Institutional Design for the Extraterritorial Effect of Artificial Intelligence Law |
|
|
| Abstract:The transnational nature of artificial intelligence （AI） activities necessitates global gover-nance of AI. Given that current international AI regulation is primarily composed of non-binding “soft law” and due to technological disparities between nations leading to legislative gaps in some countries，developing the extraterritorial effect of China’s AI legislation emerges as a suitable approach for achieving effective global AI governance. International law does not prohibit states from extending their laws extraterritorially，however，the design and implementation of such extraterritorial application of AI law must meet the “genuine link” standard. China possesses both the national capacity and willingness to implement the extraterritorial effect of AI law. The institutional design should adopt a dual model consisting of AI regulatory law and AI civil liability law. For the former，unilateral extraterritorial rules should be deve-loped on three levels: territoriality principle，effects-based jurisdiction, and protective principle. As for the latter，specific extraterritorial provisions are unnecessary and can instead be governed by conflict-of-laws rules. |
| keywords:artificial intelligence law extraterritorial effect extraterritorial application AI governance |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器 |
